Summary:

Delivered during the first day of the UN Working Group December 16 to 18.

www.crin.org/resources/infoDetail.asp?ID=21261

www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/OEWG/index.htm

We welcome the opportunity to contribute to this session on reasons for, and timing of, the elaboration of an Optional Protocol and thank the speakers and delegates for their valued contributions.

We take this opportunity to highlight four key reasons for elaborating a communications procedure to the CRC:

1.To provide a remedy when national systems fail to address child rights violations when national systems fail them, when the CRC is not applied by national judges, when national law contradicts the CRC, or simply does not exist, children do not have any means to seek redress for violations of their rights under the CRC.

Whilst regional human rights systems and other treaty bodies may provide some means of redress, they do not adjudicate specifically on the CRC itself nor cover all the rights guaranteed by the CRC.

2.To Strengthen the effective implementation of the CRC at national level

In many instances, the detailed implications of the rights and principles of the CRC and – crucially - their interdependence are not clearly understood and thus not fully incorporated into national law.

By considering communications and issuing decisions, the Committee will be further strengthened in providing expert clarification on these comlex issues and, as such, further assist States to better understand and implement their obligations.

3.To establish jurisprudence on the rights guaranteed by the CRC

The lack of a communication procedure for the CRC leaves courts of various States to interpret the provisions of the Convention without clear jurisprudence and expert guidance from the Committee. In some cases, the wide range of interpretation may in fact limit the rights of the child.

If the aim of the Convention is to hold duty-bearers legally accountable for meeting the obligations and to give real meaning to child rights, then a communications procedure for the Convention would ensure consistency in the interpretation of the high standards of the CRC.

4. To Strengthen the status of children as right holders

The existence of a communications procedure under the CRC will confirm and strengthen the status of children as rights holders. It will be a strong reaffirmation from the international community, that children are not “mini human beings with mini human rights”.

Mr Chairperson...

The elaboration of this Optional Protocol to the CRC is long overdue, and the 20th anniversary of the Convention, and these discussions, are a golden opportunity to draw a line in the sand, and to move forward in a constructive spirit and establish, once-and-for-all, the fullest possible legal status and usage of the Convention.

In closing, we maintain that the reasons to proceed - are many and compelling, and that the timing is ideal to seek to strengthen the mandate of the working group in order to begin the vital work of elaborating the 3rd Optional Protocol to the CRC.

Thank you Mr Chairperson.

Further information

• Information about the meeting on OHCHR
  
• About the campaign and how to get involved
• Sigh the petition and get the latest news and updates on the campaign
• Read the Resolution of the HRC establishing the Working Group
•  

Previous Statement items

• 10/12/2009: HUMAN RIGHTS DAY 2009: Discrimination
• 07/12/2009: COUNCIL OF EUROPE: CRIN Statement at Child-Friendly Justice Meeting
• 03/12/2009: AFRICA: Recommendations from child rights civil society
• 23/11/2009: Déclaration d’ENOC pour marquer le 20ème anniversaire de l’adoption de la Convention des droits de l’enfant
• 19/11/2009: ENOC: Statement on 20th Anniversary of the CRC

Organisation Contact Details:

NGO Group for CRC Complaints Mechanism Working Group
Peter Newell on peter@endcorporalpunishment.org or Sara Austin on sara_austin@worldvision.ca.

Last updated 17/12/2009 02:52:36

Please note that these reports are hosted by CRIN as a resource for Child Rights campaigners, researchers and other interested parties. Unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of CRIN and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by CRIN.